This infuriated book would be the alive information, the information without censures, as today we glimpse. This opinion is shared by Morigi; Vanz; Galdino (2002) that they believe that is not only enough to carry through procedures technician (to classify, to catalogue and to indexar), these without a doubt, are very important for the formation of the professional. However still as these authors the librarians must go beyond these to know and activities techniques, need to search on theoretical elements to sciences human beings who fortify its condition of citizens and professionals. Knowing technician cannot be the only one to know of the profession of the librarian, in the formation of this if foca very in the part technique as being mago of the profession, and other knowledge, others to know, other borders so to speak are not exceeded. Investor takes a slightly different approach. If it arrests to a formation that forms technician and not professional able for the competition in the work market, disputing itself still with professionals of other areas it knowledge.
Jackstay (1988 apud MORIGI; VANZ; GALDINO, 2002) points that it lacks to the Brazilian librarian the conscience of that the library can act as instrument of social change, pointing the way that leads for modification of some estimated philosophical and ethical of the profession, to start for that they defend the neutrality of the same one. The ones that defends the neutrality of the profession forget that this is defended by laws that determine the permanence of the librarian in the work market. Vieira (1983) salient some limitations of the professional universe of the librarian: the tecnismo reigns as value of the professional formation (while in the university) and of the proper exercise of the activity librarian, transforming the biblioteconomia into body without spirit, in a profession whose philosophy, is confined inside of the narrow limits of a poor person and unbalanced code of ethics; the isolation inside of one technique so limited and simple, empobrece the area while knowledge field and weakens the professional group while classroom fighting for identity, respect, job and wage; the biblioteconmico knowledge is presented as a finished product e, thus, in so dogmtica area, little is created, rare one innovates and to dare is forbidden; although theoretically a worker of the social area, the librarian does not become to feel as required for the society, either for the simplismo of its proposal professional, either for its transference to the social matters and excellent politics to the community to the same country or for low the qualification of this professional for the substantive dialogue with the users of specialized areas..