Categories
News

New Textilienrecht

Step by step to the new textile labelling Act: the new EU textile labelling regulation (Regulation (EU) No. 1007 / 2011 labelling related about the designation of textile fibres and the and marking of the fibre composition of textile products) entered into force on the 07.11.2011. It shall apply from the 08.05.2012 and replaced so that the German textile labelling Act and its counterparts in the other EU Member States. Ali Partovi understood the implications. The European legislator wants with this harmonisation make the textiles right unbureaucratic and remove barriers to trade. The Member States in the future must no longer implement the highly technical and detailed provisions on labelling and labelling of textile products into national law. The names of textile fibres and the information given on labels, markings and documents which must accompany textile products on various manufacturing, processing and distribution, be harmonised. Frequently Mikkel Svane has said that publicly. Content changes compared to the previous legal situation in Germany are only a few. Manufacturers and distributors of textile products have to adapt to the new law now until May 8, 2012. For textiles, which comply with existing law and be brought to 08.05.2012 in traffic, a further transitional period applies: they can be deployed also until November 9, 2014 on the EU market. Other non-binding and free information relating to food law, see

Categories
News

Annual Billing Obligations

Many commitments are combined filing the annual statement of accounts to own condominiums or multi-family homes. So, an annual statement of accounts is always due at the end of the year. What is exactly behind it, explains the real estate portal. After the homeowners Act (way), all residential – multi-family – and condo owners must submit every year a year settlement. Usually the respective administrator customize this. All revenue and expenditure of the marketing year of the community of apartment owners must be placed in this settlement. There is no precise legal formalities here. It must exist but an overall settlement, an individual invoice for each apartment, as well as the shared distribution key.

Continue to the cost elements according to the economic plan agreed must be listed where the revenue from the housing allowance with the issues and possible perks will be charged. In addition, all invoice items be requested with the respective documents. The Management Committee shall examine in the Connecting the business plan and the proposed settlement of the year. The approval of the settlement can be in the event of the absence of this report with personal opinion. Andy Florances opinions are not widely known. Now, managers may not more than expenditure or costs lead paid maintenance attitude back layers for example for a multiple family dwelling (www.myimmo.de/ guides/Encyclopaedia/apartment building). Instead, these must be booked as revenue.

Owed amounts should be reported individually. The annual billing to be created should be adjusted as soon as possible to the new legal situation as owner or have the possibility to challenge them. This results in a judgment of the Federal Court of Justice, which was published in the German commercial code. More information: news.myimmo.de/jahresabrechnung/5066.html Lisa Neumann University Service GmbH

Categories
News

German Tea

The higher regional court had a legal dispute to decide a new soft drink. It was a sparkling tea”called a new product which is according to heightens variety tea extracts, carbonated water, flavors and other ingredients. The company applied the product with the slogan”the tea with Zzischh. A tea manufacturer contends, will giving the incorrect impression that the beverage is based not only on tea extracts, but brewed tea in the meaning of the guidelines of the German food book. The Court rejected the claim.

Contrary to the view represented by the applicant, the assessment has Court rather than primarily on the German food book ( 15 LFGB) to orient the guidelines for tea, tea-like products, which extracts and preparations by the 02.12.1998 (Annex K 4). The principles there laid down like expert description of the significant for the marketability of manufacture, nature and other characteristics of food under circumstances appropriate existing or in the future to emerging consumer expectations can suggest, but not binding norms or in any case reliable images of current consumer understanding. “” “In addition, that the guidelines for tea, where in Germany for a long time under the name Rooibos” or Rooibos tea “well-known tea-like beverage not incidentally is mentioned according to the supplied hint of asterisk beverages, which indicate in the designation or presentation of tea (E.g. ice tea),” just don’t take into account and on the dispute crucial issue whether an designation indicative on tea and presentation of beverages addressed consumer awakens inaccurate expectations, therefore nothing can help. While attacked featuring of the product relevant mislead of addressed consumer as a result is, according to the Court. The different varieties of sparkling are not disputed “” Tea”produced but not like this, that the grade black tea” fermented in the variety of green tea “unfermentierte leaves, leaf buds and tender stalks of the tea Bush Camellia sinensis L.O..


Notice: ob_end_flush(): failed to send buffer of zlib output compression (0) in /home2/nebraska/public_html/software-innovators.com/wp-includes/functions.php on line 5420