Tag: beauty

And in last position, albeit with a significant 20 per cent, are those who prefer hybrid driving mode to the classics, either by its softness or by the efficiency they represent. 3. To the rhythm that evolves the market, when think that buying an electric car will be reasonable? More than one third of the respondents fixed that date in 2015 or 2016, a very reasonable estimate. The remaining most are more pessimistic and believe that date beyond 2016. Only 12% think that in 2013 or 2014 we could have them, and a symbolic 1.65% believe that they would be already a reality in 2011 or 2012. 4 Do you think that electric/alternative cars should subsidize? In general most of the respondents think that it is necessary to give a boost to the industry if it is to implement the technology of electric cars, although 40% thought that they should get ahead by themselves or there are better places in which to invest public money. 5.

In your opinion, with new cars go driving pleasure away? 70% Believed that the driving pleasure is maintained, the bad news is that the majority of respondents thinks that this will come in the long run, since the former will not transmit the same sensations. 6 Do you have a hybrid or electric car? Surveyed readers a 2.67% has a hybrid car, a minority percentage. However it could grow significantly in about a year, since a 4.08% intend to buy it during 2011. About Motorpasion Motorpasion is a collective publication dedicated to follow the news from the world of motoring, motoring news and competition. In Motorpasion visitors will find most interesting car models, more juicy rumors and more conscientious analyses on passenger cars, SUVs and vans, among many others, maintaining a balance between the follow-up to the dizzying news of developments in the automotive sector and the necessary dose of curiosities and councils that serve to make them more party.

When Intel presented/displayed to the new members of the Intel family, immediately the landscape of the PC change of dramatic and unexpected form. During the last decade, the common perception has been that whereas Intel makes an overhead product in general terms, AMD, main competitor of Intel, offer to the consumers a better value by dollar. Nevertheless, with the launching of Intel Core i5, concretely the 750, at the end of 2009, Intel not only again took the best crown from the PC for the home, did but also that it to as low price as the one of its competitor made by AMD, the AMD Phenom X4. Perhaps most impressive of i5-750 it was the express and the good that gained the consumers of games, a market segment that had been the AMD life-guard. At the time of the beginning of i5, Intel also presented/displayed i7.

The main difference between i5-750 and i7 is that i5 does not have Hyper-processor (HTT). In other words, i5 is limited four physical nuclei, whereas i7 can be acceded to four additional virtual nuclei. Nevertheless, this is not just like to have eight nuclei. The benchmark test that the users only realize benefit of HTT in specific scenes, most of which are outside the scope of the normal use. Aside from HTT, the Lynnfield Core i5 has everything what i7 has, although to a slightly slower rate of clock: 2,66 GHz. But i5-750 can increase its speed of clock of up to 3.2 GHz when it is necessary through a called function I disturb Boost.

I disturb Boost allows the CPU to increase the rate of one (2.8 GHz) or two (3.2 GHz) nuclei by means of the decontamination of one or two nuclei. " inconveniente" it is that it only works when at least one of the four nuclei this in use, even so the increase of speed is not more beneficial when software is not taking advantage from the architecture of the four nuclei. Another one of the benefits of the Lynnfield architecture used by i5-750 is the controller of double channel of memory DDR3. What allows that when the system uses the memory in pairs (2 xs 1 GB, 2 x2 GB, 4 x2 GB, and so on) is made more efficient use of the memory. One of the most exciting aspects of Intel Core i5 is its efficiency energetics. In comparison with i7-920/930 in the heat of load, i5-750 uses less up to 60 watts. In addition, as I disturb Boost is essentially overclocking for the masses, i5-750 does underclocking of the following way. When the nuclei are not in use, it extinguishes i5-750 them, which is equivalent to a real saving in the course of a year when the majority of the times the equipment is in delay way or it is used to sail by the Web. We used to say that Intel was the king of the yield, but that AMD has provided us better value by dollar. How they have changed the times. Now, one says that the Intel family Core i7 is the yield king, but that i5-750 offers the best relation /precio quality, and also he is the unquestionable king of the energy efficiency. There are few doubts of why one is of the most sold in the market.